The Independent Football Regulator unveiled a new transparency metric this week that quantifies institutional autonomy by tracking how often officials invoke the concept of independence. Chairman David Kogan's personal independence rating plummeted to 23 percent after he used variations of the word "independent" eleven times during a single interview about potential government involvement in the Manchester City case.

The measurement system, developed by the IFR's newly created Office of Regulatory Self-Assessment, assigns each mention of independence a negative coefficient based on conversational frequency. Kogan's rating dropped precipitously when he referenced the regulator's independent status in consecutive sentences while explaining that no politician had attempted to influence his independent decision-making process regarding the independent commission's findings.

The scoring algorithm drew criticism from linguistics experts who noted that regulatory bodies in other sectors never mention their autonomous status during routine operational discussions. The Financial Conduct Authority has uttered the word "independent" six times in five years of public statements, maintaining an independence score of 91 percent under the IFR methodology.

Following the dramatic decline in measured autonomy, the regulator distributed a mandatory synonym database to all staff members. Officials must now consult the reference tool before speaking publicly to avoid trigger words that compromise their institutional standing. The database offers 47 alternatives including "impartial," "sovereign," "self-directed," and "detached from external influence," though internal testing revealed that many substitutes produced similar negative effects on independence metrics.

The regulator announced a complete organizational rebrand after external consultants determined that removing "Independent" from the agency's official title would increase actual independence by 40 percent. The body will now operate simply as "The Regulator," with officials instructed to describe their work using only concrete procedural language.

Preliminary data from the rebranding showed immediate improvements in autonomy scores. During his first public appearance representing The Regulator, Kogan achieved an 88 percent independence rating by discussing statutory powers and investigative timelines without once characterizing the nature of his institutional relationship to government oversight.